The Cesspool vs. Trump

Let’s not forget to mention that Cesspool of critics of the President and his family that collectively qualify as the quagmire of our nation’s cultural degeneracy – the arts and entertainment industry.

In earlier history, two trends developed in art world, one in the 1700’s during the so-called Enlightenment, wherein art became more independent from moral traditions and religious restraints, and in the 1800’S during the so-called Secession.

In 1897, an artist’s movement “The Vienna Secession” took place in Vienna Austria, as part of a larger Secession trend with conclaves in Munich and Berlin. Although begun that way, it changed from a solely architectural movement to include visual arts and then, virtually, art of all types. They evolved as an anti-academic and anti-traditional movement where the range of any art form was encouraged and legitimized. There were no longer restraints to any specific artistic or architectural style.

Artists began isolating themselves into art communities and collegially and collectively became indifferent to public values. Art became decidedly more secular and more “private” and “internal” to the artist – virtually ignoring public tastes, often seeking shock value. Many artists lost all sense of community as the source and substance of art simply became the mind of the artist, not life reality or intelligible experiences. They often ignored the needs of the audience, became anarchical to standards, and predictably advocatory in promoting their own agenda and worldview.

Hence, now years later, we have our own arts and entertainment anarchists in a triple whammy – promoting their worldview, advocating for their agenda while appealing often to all the basest appetites of their audience for their self-aggrandizement and profit. Traditional and religious limits or constraints are slandered by them as they push to extend boundaries in visuals, morals, and dialogue and desensitize standards of public tastes. And what worldview do they advocate? Naturally, it’s the Socialist, Democratic, Liberal perspective which makes them unblinkingly hostile to the President and his agenda. More so, since the President, who admittedly was once of their company, has abandoned his former lifestyle to reform and transform into a more traditional and conventional family man, ethical businessman, citizen, and patriot.

Love,                                                                                                                                                          Joe Rogowski                                                                                                                                           “Life is a special occasion”                                                                                                                          Hallmark Corproation

Schumer, Borkin’ Joe and the Supreme Court

Chuckie Schumer’s recent attack on Supreme Court Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch is an emerging reminder of the Democrats continuing, flagrant attempts to make the Supreme Court a branch of the Democrat Party.

Joe Biden has been somewhat the invisible man over the last ten years lurking in the background twixt the wretched Obama years and the current successes of the Trump administration. His recent emergence gushes up recollections of the dreadful malice he displayed during the U.S. Senate Judiciary hearings on the nomination of Robert Bork in 1987 and of Clarence Thomas in 1991 to the Supreme Court.

Millennials, preoccupied in hunting a satisfying career path, burdened by college debt and indecision on job choices, remain untutored on some past vital national history. The years of 1987-1991 seem eons away for millennials and recent grads, thus they’re lax in concern for those seismic events that presage their current, daily news intake.

Joe, the last living member of the Biden to Kennedy to Metzenbaum clique of that 1991 committee, found it in his heart to suggest that he may have mistreated Anita Hill, a last minute witness called up to censure Clarence Thomas with her disputed testimony. Borkin’ Joe found himself awash in the Mendacious Media outlets for not making a suitable apology to her. Thus, Anita Hill has withheld her stately acceptance of Joe’s apology as unacceptable, probably because he did confess to colleagues, on the side, that she lied during her testimony victimizing Thomas.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/28/joe-biden-on-anita-hill-in-1998-she-was-lying/

The Mendacious Media is not inclined to to suggest that it is Clarence Thomas who is due the apology from Borkin’ Joe, because of the cunning attempts to subvert his nomination by the partisan, liberal Biden-Kennedy-Metzenbaum slanders, in what Thomas heroically and valiantly branded as a “high tech lynching!”

Biden, in 1987, had displayed ample dark side inclinations with his scurrilous methods exemplified by releasing the Biden Report that undergirded the merciless Kennedy/ Metzenbaum personal attacks on Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court by Ronald Reagan. Biden, always since, has sought to bork ‘em all.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2016/02/13/flashback-joe-biden-wrote-the-playbook-on-borking-a-presidents-nominee/

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/america-freer-with-bork-on-supreme court/

So, is Chuckie Schumer now laying the groundwork for the real Borkin’ Joe Biden to take new steps forward in attempting to intimidate the Supreme Court with his attacks on Gorsuch and Kavanaugh? Chuckie and Joe sure would make President Trump look like a choir boy.

Love,                                                                                                                                                     Joe Rogowski                                                                                                                                            “Life is a special occasion”                                                                                                          Hallmark Corporation